Tuesday, 22 November 2016

Film Piracy

The movie industry excels in selling dreams. But since the dawn of the digital revolution, there is one narrative they've consistently and conspicuously failed to sell: that piracy is theft and consumers who indulge ought to feel guilty about it. Recent research by Ipsos suggests that almost 30% of the UK population is active in some form of piracy, either through streaming content online or buying counterfeit DVDs. Such theft costs the UK audiovisual industries about £500m a year.

Hypothetically, two movies come out on the same day: The Wolf of Wall Street and the new Transformers. You are allowed to see one in an IMAX theater and you will illegally download the other one online. Most people would choose Transformers over The Wolf of Wall Street due to the fact that there are robot dinosaurs and everyone else is going to see it in theaters. Those robot dinosaurs will look a lot cooler in a theater rather than on a laptop. Many people then realized how lacking the movie really was after walking out of their local theater’s showing of Transformers: Age of Extinction. Meanwhile, many of the same people went on to watch The Wolf of Wall Street online to realize that it was actually a really good movie. Most people don’t realize that this is at all a problem, and at first glance it’s not. However, after more in-depth research, the problem soon becomes apparent. Transformers: Age of Extinction only gained an 18% rating on Rotten Tomatoes (Transformers, Rotten Tomatoes), one of the most critical and most trusted film-review sites online. The Wolf of Wall Street, however, gained a 77% rating on the same site (Wolf of Wall Street, Rotten Tomatoes). It was also nominated for five different Academy Awards. The Wolf of Wall Street is clearly the better film. Yet, besides the fact that Transformers was clearly not a great film, it somehow managed to be named the highest grossing film worldwide of 2014 and earned over one billion dollars in the Box Office (2014 Worldwide Grosses). The Wolf of Wall Street went on to be the most pirated film of 2014 with over 30 million illegal downloads (Spangler, 1) and didn’t even gross $117 million, giving the producers and the studio under $17 million after the production cost, which is not a much of a profit at all for such a high-budget film.

Piracy has become more of a problem in the past decade than it ever has before, specifically movie piracy. In fact, a study from Columbia University came out recently that said at least 45% of US citizens pirate movies actively, but that number bumps up to 70% if you include the younger demographics as well (Mick, 2). This act of pirating is growing more and more common every year and most people do it mindlessly, not realizing what it costs. Everyone has seen the text at the beginning of movies saying “Piracy is not a victimless crime,” and this is completely true. Piracy is extremely harmful to the movie industry and its effects are larger than anyone could imagine.

But Where Do These Pirated Movies Come From?
There are many different ways that people pirate movies. One of the most classic ways people pirate is by “leaking” them. This involves a person going into a movie theater with a camera or a phone and recording the movie as it plays. It is usually a poor quality, but many people still download these recordings anyways instead of going to see it in a theater. This usually occurs when it is only in theater since that is the only version most people are able to see. Sometimes these leaks occur before the movie is even premiered, often because it is filmed during a special premier before the opening night. This is referred to as a pre-release, and they tend to result in a 19% decrease in how much the movie makes at the Box Office (Hart, 2). Many people defend pre-releases because it gives a movie more publicity so more people would want to see it, but the facts state otherwise. Leaking a movie that’s in the theaters always tends to decrease how much the movie makes regardless of when it is released and sometimes even leads to the movie not even making as much as there was put into it.

One of the other common ways for a movie to be pirated is for it to be digitally hacked. This one has become more common lately as technology improves. One of the most extreme and recent examples was the Sony hacking. Though some people will claim that Sony faked the hacking, evidence shows that they were legitimately hacked. During this hacking, many of Sony’s movies were released illegally online, such as Annie and Fury (Note: Annie had not even been released yet). A hacking involves someone digitally cracking into the studio or company’s computer system and taking the movie from their files. This logically would actually decrease a movie’s Box Office revenue by even more than someone’s recording of the movie would because it’s a better quality.

There are more ways to watch a pirated movie other than just downloading it online. In fact, some people tend to start their own pirating businesses. It’s very inexpensive and easy for a person to start one of these businesses. More recently, people only need to buy a bunch of blank DVD’s, the same amount of DVD cases and a computer that can burn a DVD. From there, they must find a source to get the pirated movies from. Sometimes they will personally film them in a theater, or find a hacked or leaked version online and download it. After that, all they need to do is download the stolen films onto their blank DVD’s and sell them to anyone who is willing to purchase it. Within a short amount of time, this person has made a great deal of money that should have gone to the movie studios.

What Kind of Effect Does it Have?
Most people would just say that pirating has a small effect on the industry and that the studios already have enough money. They believe watching a movie online isn’t going to hurt anyone. The Motion Picture Association of America looked into this belief and discovered that piracy costs around $20.5 billion annually in the United States alone (Plumer, 2). In fact, a study back in 2005 estimated that a 10% decrease in worldwide piracy, including both film and music, over the course of four years would add 1.5 million jobs, $64 billion in taxes and $400 billion in economic growth (Kai-Lung). That, however, was ten years ago and is outdated. Those numbers are likely to be much higher today due to inflation and an increase in popularity of the film industry. This means that the studios are making much smaller amounts of money than they should be making from their films due to piracy.

Quit Talking Numbers. How Does it Effect My Movie Experience?
The decrease in money from studios will often decrease the quality of other movies and even sequels, but more often it will decrease the quantity. A studio is much more likely to throw all of their money into the next big franchise sequel than give half of it to the franchise and the other half to a movie like Twelve Years a Slave simply because Twelve Years a Slave won’t sell as well in theaters as the franchise movie will. Movie studios and production companies don’t look at reviews and DVD sales nearly as much as they look at the Box Office Revenue, or how much it makes in the theater.
In many cases, piracy of a film will even damage the likeliness of a franchise sequel. For example, the Kick-Ass movies came to an end due to lack of funding from piracy. According to ChloĆ« Grace Moretz who stars as “Hit-Girl” in the series, Kick-Ass 2 was one of the most pirated films of 2013 despite having an extremely low Box Office Revenue (Highfill). Because of this, the plans for the third movie in the series have been cancelled. Whether or not you like the Kick-Ass series, it is clear that piracy has become a serious problem and will only continue to damage the film industry.

What About New Movies That Aren't Franchises Yet?
It is not franchise movies that need to be worried about, though; it is the movies by the independent filmmakers. Due to the increase in film piracy, production companies and movie studios are now much less likely to loan money out to an independent filmmaker with an idea than they are to a team of writers and producers working on a Harry Potter spin-off. When people think of the term ‘independent filmmaker’, they think of a man in his 20’s with an Associates Degree in Theatre that wrote a screenplay in two weeks. Though these people are independent filmmakers, I refer to the higher kind of independent filmmakers that actually make Oscar nominated films, but take out enormous loans to do so. Now, due to piracy, no matter how many Oscars their movie is nominated for, many filmmakers are having to foreclose their houses or take out further loans from a bank to make up for the losses in the Box Office for their film due to piracy. It also means that the studios do not get their money back that they invested with and therefore stop funding films without promises of success like Birdman or The Theory of Everything, both of whom won Oscars this year.
Now Let's Think More Economically...
The loss of money affects more than just the filmmakers and studios, however. It helps the entire economy grow due to tax and job increase. Pirating less films will mean that the studios will get more money, which leads to more movies, which employs people like hairdressers, electricians, actors, costume designers and countless other occupations. This will add more jobs to the United States and will also add more tax money to help the country.

But Is It Really Stealing?
Many people argue that piracy is not illegal because they are not technically stealing anything. Though they are not physically taking away anything from anyone, they are stealing intellectual property. Just because you can’t hold a movie file in your hands does not mean that it is not someone’s property. Downloading a film online is the equivalent of stealing a movie from a movie store. It may not come in the same fancy case as a movie at the store, but it still carries the same contents. By pirating a film, you are stealing the money that should have been paid had you watched the movie legally. You do not have a right to watch whatever movies you want to watch without having to pay for them just as I do not have a right to walk into the local Dollar General and eat their candy bars without paying first. As much as people may argue it, film piracy is stealing. It is not your property, so it is not yours to take without paying for it first.

Going Back to my Original Example at the Beginning of All of This...
The Wolf of Wall Street was 2014’s most pirated movie with over 30 million piracies worldwide. Let’s do the math to see how much money piracy actually robbed this movie of had these people gone to see it in a theater instead. In 2014, the average price of a movie ticket in the United States was $8.17 (Linshi, 1). When a person goes to see a movie in the theater, the money spent on the ticket goes to two different places. It is split between the movie studio and the movie theater, with more going to the theater the longer the movie has been out (Campea). For the purposes of now, let’s average that overall the theater and the studio would each get 50% of the ticket price. Now for the part with the actual math. If each illegal download of The Wolf of Wall Street, which more specifically evens out to around 30,035,000 downloads (Spangler, 1) equals one movie ticket that costs $8.17, and the movie studio only gets half of the amount from each movie ticket, that results in about $122,692,975 that was robbed from Paramount Pictures for just that one movie. That amount stolen was more than the movie actually made in the Box Office, and that is assuming that only one person watched each illegal download. Several of those downloads were most likely copied onto multiple different blank DVD’s and given out to others to watch illegally. That is even more money that was robbed from The Wolf of Wall Street. In the Box Office, the movie barely broke even out of how much they spent making the film. These numbers would have helped the studio, the filmmakers and the crew a lot more in order to make even more Oscar nominated movies. Unfortunately, these thirty million people seemed to overlook that.

Now the Real Question: How Do We Stop Piracy?
It all starts at home, just like it takes a spark to start a fire. Many people argue that “everyone is watching movies illegally online, so why is it different if I do it?” Well the same argument could again go for people that steal candy bars from a store. It may cost more than you like and others may do it, but it is not your property to steal. Like voting, if just one person takes a stand against piracy it will make a difference. Simply quit pirating movies or watching them online. There are many different excuses people use about watching movies online illegally, but it does not override the fact that it is illegal. Even streaming movies online is illegal if it is not authorized by the studio that made the film. If you aren’t willing to pay to watch the film, you aren’t allowed to watch it. This is the way the industry works.

What Can The Theaters Do?
A way for movie theaters to prevent piracy is to change their types of projectors. In the past, the government came up with a way to prevent the filming of a movie in the theaters. They did this by projecting an infrared spectrum over the projected film. This infrared image was not visible to the audience, but it would make the video on the camera someone brought into film the movie into a very low quality that would make the video almost unbearable to watch. Since then technology has improved to attempt to improve the quality of the filmed video regardless of the infrared. Though this has worked to an extent, film pirates have not yet fully recovered from the addition of the infrared. Only more research will be able to help improve the projectors so that this does not happen anymore.

What Happens if Someone gets Caught?!
When it all comes down to it, one of the major reasons you should avoid pirating movies is that its an enormous risk. Since it is illegal, there are certainly punishments for those that choose to break this law. These punishments are severe. For example, if a person is convicted of a misdemeanor in piracy, as in they only downloaded or uploaded a small amount of movies without the owner’s consent, the person would be punished with up to a year of prison time and would have a fine of up to $100,000, depending on the extent of the piracy. That, however, is just for a small offense. For someone that downloads or uploads movies illegally without the owner’s consent in large amounts will be charged with a felony. The punishment of this crime is up to 5 years of imprisonment and up to $250,000 in fines. The fine, though, can be more. In some cases, the fine is set as double what the person gained for pirating the films if they made money off of it, or it set as double the amount of money the person cost the studios he or she stole from (AlanS). In any of these cases, it is clear that movie piracy is not worth the risk.

Piracy is Clearly an Enormous Threat
Filmmakers are in danger of losing their jobs and the movie theaters are in danger of only showing films like Transformers sequels and Terminator reboots. Helping the film industry does not just entail not illegally watching a movie, it also entails going to see those movies in a theater to reverse the mistakes made by those who don’t realize the consequences. Some of the greatest films do not get the proper credibility in the theaters because people are too distracted by other films or because people would think it’s smarter to illegally watch it on their computer than paying to see it in a theater. As stated earlier, this has many more consequences than these people would think, such as taking away jobs, taking over $20.5 billion from the US film industry and decreasing both the quantity and quality of the very movies they are downloading. In addition, is it really worth spending five years of your life in prison just because you didn’t want to pay to watch a movie? It’s time to stop pirating and to stop making excuses for watching a movie illegally online. Film is a form of art. People use it to tell their stories.

Disney as a Conglomerate

Disney as a conglomerate
Disney is a conglomerate

media conglomeratemedia group or media institution is a company that owns large numbers of companies in various mass media such as television, radio, publishing, movies, and the Internet. Media conglomerates strive for policies that facilitate their control of the markets across the globe.

Disney owns
  • Walt Disney Studios
  • Buena Vista Home Entertainment
  • Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group:
  • Touchstone Pictures
  • Pixar Animation Studios
  • Lucasfilm
  • ESPN
  • ABC Entertainment Group
  • Marvel Entertainment
  • Disney Music Group

The media industry is dominated by 'The Big Six'



Just how dominant are 'The Big Six' studios?


How many independent films can you spot?


Why might conglomerates be seen as a negative?

Global conglomerates can at times have a progressive impact on culture, especially when they enter nations that had been tightly controlled by corrupt crony media systems (as in much of Latin America) or nations that had significant state censorship over media (as in parts of Asia). The global commercial-media system is radical in that it will respect no tradition or custom, on balance, if it stands in the way of profits. But ultimately it is politically conservative, because the media giants are significant beneficiaries of the current social structure around the world, and any upheaval in property or social relations—particularly to the extent that it reduces the power of business—is not in their interest.— 

Robert W. McChesney, The New Global Media; It’s a Small World of Big Conglomerates, The Nation Magazine, November 29, 1999

Monday, 21 November 2016

Hotel Babylon: Improved

The Director uses several camera Shots and Editing techniques to show stereotypes in ethnicity.


Firstly, an over-the-shoulder shot is used to show the immigration entering the Hotel, this shot represents the uneasiness of the receptionist who now has to deal with the situation of potential workers being taken away and deported. Immediately after a Tracking shot is used to show the danger the immigration squad poses to the hotel. Another over-the-shoulder shot is used to build up tension in the scene as now the immigration squad's leader is talking to the receptionist.  This forces the audience into a unconformable position which furthers ramps up the tension. Asynchrounous sound is used when the receptionist addressees Ben, this is done to show that the receptionist is trying to fabricate a lie in order to save as many workers as she possibly can.    Next, A-Shot-reverse-shot is used to show that Ben has to warn the others about the immigration squad coming for them, the fact the that Ben, A black man, is shown sitting down whilst the other characters are all standing up is a stereotype of ethnicity where black's are lower in status than white people. However ben's purpose in this scene is to help the white protagonists save the other workers meaning he is being a counter stereotype.







Evaluate the role of digital technologies in the marketing and Consumption of product in the media area you have studied.

Digital technologies have an important role in the marketing and consumption of films as it make films such as Star wars The Force Awakens available to everyone and create awareness of the product. They can be used in standard ways such as mass promotion over social media or online media and can also be used through TV and radio to gain a large audience, Whereas a niche film such as Ex-Machina had to use innovative and clever marketing strategies  through Social media to gain wide mainstream media attention in order for people to watch the film.




In today's society. We live in a digital age where it's crucial that film companies engage and interact with their audience. With this. Ex-Machina took full advantage of this and used Below the Line media to get attention to the film and use Above the Line media to advertise it for them instead. to do this. They used the dating app Tinder and set up a fake account of the films female protagonist Ava, they did so by using Alicia Vikander face. It was set up to advertise the film During the South by South West Film festival. It was a Bot that when it found Matches would ask them a series of questions which would be about what makes people human, where they would meet and what they found attractive about Ava. Afterwards the users would be directed to an Instagram account which promoted the film. This was done as their wasn't much promotion for the film. They didn't have any big posters on the side of buses or on billboards, nor did they have a Conglomerate help produce the film. only distribute it. Also there was only 1 or 2 trailers on YouTube showcasing the film. So what they did to promote the film was out of necessity in order to get people to watch the film and stir up mainstream media attention. which it did. Once it had been uncovered. Newspapers covered the story, internet blogs post were all over the place talking about it and it made it onto some news stations.
Ex-Machina was rated 15 meaning it had less of a audience to watch it and was a niche meaning some people would like it while others don't making it target audience smaller. making their marketing campaign with Tinder all the more important.



Meanwhile, Star Wars the Force Awakens had mass media promotion due to it being produced by a Conglomerate In Walt Disney. This is turn allowed for a lot of ways to market the film which turned out to be one of the largest media marketing campaigns for any film ever created. They were able to get several teaser trailers 3 full length trailers onto YouTube alone. Furthermore, it received widespread media attention through social media especially on google where you could search "Google Star wars" and if u clicked on i'm feeling lucky. It would allow you to change your Google+ avatar to be on the light side or the dark side. The Force Awakens also had Huge venues such as the 2015 Comic-Con where it held a special panel discussing the film along with some behind-the-scenes footage and a sneak peak at the film itself. Another way of marketing The Force Awakens was through TV interviews which talk shows such as Graham Norton or Jimmy Kimmel and magazine interview in almost every type of magazine from Rolling Stone to Empire which created more mainstream media attention. Another important note is that The force awakens was rated 12 meaning it more widely available to audiences as a mainstream film and that kids could watch if with an adult as most 12 films are actually 12A making them largely accessible to people.



Consumption of Film is also really important as the film needs to be available in different formats in order to be able to watched by as many people as possible. For The Force Awakens. It was released onto every single format that it used in Modern society. this includes: Seeing it in cinema; DVD and Blu-Ray; Streaming services such as Netflix and Downloading films onto a Portable device such as iPad or Phone. However there is also Piracy which happens to all films however The Force Awakens got hit badly by Piracy, With people downloading the Pirated version approximately 250,000 times before it was released onto DVD and Blu-Ray. Despite this. It still sold over 1.18 million copies of DVD/Blu-Ray in the first 7 days of being available. along with The Force Awakens making over $2 billion at the box office. Piracy seems like it didn't matter much but it would have still taken a huge chunk of money away from them.


For Ex-Machina, It Was Distributed on all the same formats as The Force Awakens however, it did not have as huge as a Piracy problem as The Force Awakens did. Despite this, Ex-Machina only made a fraction to what The Force Awakens did. Grossing around $36 million from the Box office. Ex-Machina made roughly $8.7 million from DVD/Blu-Ray sales, meaning that despite having less of an audience to branch out into. Implying that the wide areas of consumption helped make the film more money than they could've predicted.


However Not everything is done To marketing and Consumption Digitally. While Ex-Machina Solely relied on digital Marketing. The Force Awakens had Merchandise that it was able to sell in order to promote the film. All of the official The Force Awakens merchandise was released on the 4th September 2015 which was dubbed by fans to be called "Force Friday". The merchandise included many things including: Comic Books; Figure's; Lego sets; BB-8 Drones; Costumes and more. Coupled with that The Force Awakens was one of, if the, highest grossing films of 2015, it would sugget that the huge marketing campaign behind it helped it reach younger audiences get interested in the film and watch it with their parents. Moreover, merchandise is still being released for The Force Awakens, with a recent Lego Star Wars game being made based on the film and that there is still a lot of The Force Awakens still being sold after a year of the film being released. it proves that marketing doesn't have to be restricted to just one area.


Overall, Digital Technologies Play a Huge in the marketing and consumption of films as they're what creates hype for the films by being shown through Popular online media, social media, and digital to showcase the films and are what we Ultimately watch films on. However it should be noted that marketing also has to rely on other Methods other than Digital as Being restricted to 1 way, despite how innovative can still cause the film to lose money.

















Tuesday, 8 November 2016

The Big Six
Major Film Studios
A major film studio is a film producer and production company that releases a substantial number of films annually.
The Big Six film studios are:
1. Warner Bros. Pictures. Comprising a whopping 19.7 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Warner Bros. Pictures is the biggest player in the film industry. Securing the rights to major films like Harry Potter, Superman, Batman, The Matrix and Star Wars have made Warner Bros. the No. 1 name in the business.
2. Paramount Pictures. With 15.5 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Paramount Pictures continues to be one of the most successful film production companies in the world. Star Trek, War of the Worlds, the Mission Impossible series, Transformers and Tropic Thunder are just a few of the popular films produced by Paramount Pictures.
3. Walt Disney. One of the most renowned film production companies in the history of the business, Walt Disney now holds 15.3 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). With highly successful movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, National Treasure, Meet the Robinsons and Enchanted, there's no doubt that Disney will continue to play a key role in the industry for years to come.
4. Columbia Pictures. Comprising 12.9 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Columbia Pictures remains a big player in the business. Some of this company's recent successes include Casino Royale, The Da Vinci Code, the Spider-Man series and Step Brothers.
5. Universal Studios. 12.2 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures) belongs to Universal Studios, which continues to make millions for the film industry. With major hits like the Bourne series (Bourne Identity, Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum), The American Pie series, Knocked Up, American Gangster and The Incredible Hulk, it's very clear that Universal Studios knows what it takes to make money in this industry.
6. 20th Century Fox. Also known as "Twentieth Century Fox," this highly successful movie production company makes up 11.9 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). Some of the biggest and most successful movies from this empire include the X-Men series, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, Star Wars Episodes II and III, and the Fantastic Four.
Roughly 9/10 films in the UK are seen as a result of these distributors

Monday, 7 November 2016

How is representation of disability constructed in TV Drama: Research task

Bran Stark: Game Of Thrones
 Bran stark is game of thrones is crippled from the waist down due to being pushed out of window and subsequent fall. Due to this, he is vulnerable and has to be carried around by his companions and helped around with daily events. A common stereotype of disability as he is a super cripple and  has others help him due to his disability and also that he is vulnerable so he has to be protected aswell. However Bran also has a special ability meaning he can be useful to people who are with him. making him a counter-stereotype as usually characters with disability are meek and useless.






Tyrion Lanister: Game Of Thrones


Tyrion in game of thrones is a dwarf, meaning he is looked down upon by many in the world and is marked as Taboo/ bad luck to people who meet him, which is a common stereotype of disability that many are look down upon in society and simply put in a corner and left there and whenever needed become subject to joke and mockery. On the other hand, Tyrion is also shown in Game of thrones to be quick-witted and has shown signs of strength when killing his father and delivering his speech on mocking himself during his trial which is a counter stereotype to some degree as he is still funny to look at as he self-mocks himself, but is shown that he can be more and is actually a good person who was part of the wrong family.





Walter White JR.: Breaking Bad


Walter JR is breaking bad has cerebral palsy, due to this his character is constantly on crutches which shows he is not physically able. a stereotype of being a burden to the people he knows. He also needs help from his friends, not his parents to do certain tasks such as drive a car in which his friends teach him how to despite his disability which can be seen as a counter-stereotype as instead of being a burden and useless, he is able to do something helpful for others despite not being 100% able-bodied.










Ex-Machina Review. (Spoiler Free)

Ex-Machina is Produced by Film4 and DNA Studios and was  Directed by Alex garland who makes his debut as a director is this sci-fi thriller about A.I and the potential they have. With a small cast of 3 main characters being Caleb (Domhall Glesson), Nathan (Oscar Issac) and the A.I. herself Ava (Alicia Vikander) and a small amount of other characters, the other notable one being Kyoko (Sonoya Mizuno) who is also an A.I herself.




The plot is simple enough. Caleb wins a competition to go and spend a week with the CEO of the company he works for. only to find out once hers there. he is actually taking part in a Turing Test to see if the A.I the CEO is working on can feel thought and consciences despite being an A.I and also asks the question of what happens when he are able to create artificial life and it be able to have a consciences. Its simple but feels very similar to Frankenstein's monster. Just that its modernized.

With its small cast and claustrophobic environment. Ex-Machina does really well at building up tensions in its scenes as well as the interactions between the characters feel very important and this is backed up with some amazing Visual effects on Ava. Overall the CGI and visuals are a pleasure to look which in turn help set up the tension in certain scenes.


However, that is about the extent of the film being enjoyable. Ex-Machina is a niche film. meaning if you enjoy similar films such as Chappie, or even the old Frankenstein films. you'll enjoy it. If you love sci-fi films that aren't all action then its suited for you too. However the film sometimes tries to be audacious and it comes off as being flat. Especially with the ending where the twist they go for ends up coming across as a twist for the sake of a twist. ruining for film to some degree.

If u can look past its flaws. Ex-Machina is well worth a watch for Fans of Sci-Fi films. Or those who happen to find it 1 day on Netflix. Its worth it just for the visuals themselves. Despite the flaws, Its still a reasonable watch for Alex garland's Debut film.

Score: 7/10